I thought about this myself. In order to free her right hand, why not simply remove the left. In roman times if a doctor wanted to learn anatomy he worked at the Colosseum. Where it was perfectly fine to kill each other as a spectator sport. But carving up dead bodies simply didnt happen. Perhaps in Eloina's world, it was inconceivable for amputations or other mutilations to happen. Could toss in the possibility that the dwarven cuffs would self destruct in some way. The alchemist let her go, in order to follow her to the metals source. Rather than use a saw and remove her from them.
Posted by Yumi (guest) on Mon 27 Jul 2015, 08:45 EDT
Dumb Question - Followup
A followup to my dumb question -- from the Scratch Page on the Dwarven Eternity Fetters:
"A better effect would probably be a 'beauty defense'. Eloina's own beauty combined with her enchanted jewelery means that no one is really able to bring themselves to do serious and lasting damage to her. Other mean things is fine, however."
"I agree on this last idea, an acute variant of mesmerize. +5 Charisma from Eloina's maxed natural values (of course she's a min-maxer) makes it make sense."
So even if someone had the idea to help Elona out this way, they couldn't, because her other cursed jewelry prevents people from removing her cursed rings. Insidious! :D I wonder if Brock and Sindre knew that would happen...
Posted by KiTA (guest) on Mon 15 Jun 2015, 21:01 EDT
Dumb Question
Dumb Question... what's stopping her from getting someone to remove the rings? I mean, they're Dwarven Gold so they can't be broken, but there's nothing saying that a good healer couldn't make tiny cuts to get them out a different way. After all, don't her Dwarven Eternity Fetters give her a light regeneration?
Posted by KiTA (guest) on Fri 12 Jun 2015, 13:06 EDT
Holy cow
Holy cow, I just realized she's got her B&S rings in this image. No wonder she's wearing such a daring outfit! :)
Posted by KiTA (guest) on Fri 22 Jun 2012, 20:41 EDT
Hm
So how does this new jewelry work exactly?
1. Is it time based? I.e., if she covers her body for too long, does it then zap the offending pieces of clothing away?
2. Is it proximity based? I.e., if she got too close to someone else's clothes, would it zap them, too?
3. Is it observer based? I.e., if someone tries to look at her body, does the jewelry make sure they can see it?
The fact that she was dressed in somewhat a conservative outfit that got zapped suggests that it has to be triggered. Alternately, perhaps the jewelry took time to build up power -- so until it got enough magical strength, it couldn't do it's thing. If so, maybe it continues to get stronger the longer she wears them -- after a while, she won't be able to wear even one scrap of clothing without her jewelry destroying them. Permanent nudity.
Also: Besides her hands being bound, what's stopping her from simply removing the jewelry? I know it's probably dwarf gold, so it probably wouldn't be cutable, but with her cuffs and shackles providing regeneration, a bit of numbing ointment and a sharp knife would get rid of the jewelry, wouldn't it?
Posted by KiTA (guest) on Fri 22 Jun 2012, 20:37 EDT
She's still here
Can she be here in a larger size?
Thanks
Posted by Bill_Wa (guest) on Sun 21 Nov 2010, 00:02 EST
Wouldn't you just love to stroke a feather on those beautiful bare feet? :)
Posted by Witheld (guest) on Sat 25 Sep 2010, 08:56 EDT
Love the image!
Posted by Witheld (guest) on Sat 25 Sep 2010, 08:54 EDT
Appears she's in for an increasingly rough time - that little bare foot of hers is looking like it's going to get a real going over for a start.
Posted by Guest on Sat 21 Aug 2010, 09:16 EDT
dj0230
"I am NOT a bowling ball!"
Posted by John C. (guest) on Wed 14 Jul 2010, 14:36 EDT