Kinda surprised they didn't toss an apron or similar clothing on her. A dress that she could step into would not require her arms be free, for example.
Posted by KiTA (guest) on Thu 28 Jan 2016, 03:02 EST
A girl can learn to do all sorts of things with her wrists and elbows cuffed together; and stirring a pot is certainly an easy enough task. People are making to big of a deal about how strict her bondage is; But no-one seems to have noticed that her ankle chains are missing in this picture.
Posted by janice (guest) on Sat 21 Feb 2015, 10:15 EST
I love the innocence here
Posted by Guest on Wed 24 Feb 2010, 16:54 EST
I (the aforementioned guest) didn't mean to dismiss others fantasies. Some were suggesting that the bondage was too severe and (I thought) asking the artist to make it less severe. I was simply expressing that I appreciate the severity of it and don't want this kind of art to go away. Also, art isn't (IMO) totally open to interpretation. If I interpreted this painting to be of a unicorn, you could disagree. Some things about this are objective, like the fact that the girl is smiling, which should suggest that the bondage is, at least in her opinion, NOT to severe. I would even argue that the fact that she is smiling means that by definition the bondage is not to severe. I don't think this is an interpretation of art, I think this is a statement about bondage. In conclusion, I think the artist should make more art like this and that people who dislike this because they find it too excessive needn't look.
Peace
~Guest
Posted by guest (guest) on Tue 06 Oct 2009, 21:34 EDT
Lisa plays the part of a slavegirl, but is not really one
Agree with Guest, but suggest that this enchanted society already thinks the same way. No louts, oafs or thugs. A girly girl wants to display her beauty, love & serve, & be completely safe.
Posted by Apprentice Elf (guest) on Sat 15 Aug 2009, 06:46 EDT
Art is in the Eye of the Beholder
Each of us see different things in art. Each of us projects their own kinks into erotic art. And while Guest is more close to the original story behind this image, it doesn't make the fantasies expressed by other badwrongfun. Don't lose your cool because different people see different things in the same image.
Posted by Cidri Katz (Admin) (guest) on Wed 12 Aug 2009, 01:29 EDT
I think you guys are still missing the point. Lisa isn't a slave. The guy whittling there isn't her master and nobody forced her to cook in bondage that made it impossible for her to cook in. She enjoys having her wrists and elbows bound and she's so worried that people will judge her for it that she's volunteering to cook dinner for this random guy. I like this form of bondage much better. This isn't about oppression, it's just about beauty and kindness. She isn't being objectified or beaten into submission. She's expressing herself and hoping that society will respect her for it.
Posted by Guest on Tue 11 Aug 2009, 16:42 EDT
Demarcation dispute
Visit website code d'odalisque, where a distinction is made between house wenches & pleasure wenches. Advanced societies are able & willing to maintain some girls just as pleasure wenches. I suggest a story here, a demarcation dispute between a pleasure wench, Lisa, & a house wench. The house wench thinks Lisa is doing her job. The wench union might get involved.
Posted by Apprentice Elf (guest) on Tue 27 Jan 2009, 06:31 EST
I'd like to point out that she doesn't seem at all bothered by the extent of her bondage. If it was too hard for her to cook, she wouldn't be cooking (or at least she'd make a face about it).
Posted by Guest on Sun 11 Jan 2009, 17:55 EST
Ideal bondage
The point of bondage is restraint. There is a difference between being defenceless & being helpless. Ideal bondage makes a girl open, exposed, defenceless, but still allows her to be devoted by performing services such as cooking.
Posted by Apprentice Elf (guest) on Fri 12 Dec 2008, 05:35 EST
