I (the aforementioned guest) didn't mean to dismiss others fantasies. Some were suggesting that the bondage was too severe and (I thought) asking the artist to make it less severe. I was simply expressing that I appreciate the severity of it and don't...
I (the aforementioned guest) didn't mean to dismiss others fantasies. Some were suggesting that the bondage was too severe and (I thought) asking the artist to make it less severe. I was simply expressing that I appreciate the severity of it and don't want this kind of art to go away. Also, art isn't (IMO) totally open to interpretation. If I interpreted this painting to be of a unicorn, you could disagree. Some things about this are objective, like the fact that the girl is smiling, which should suggest that the bondage is, at least in her opinion, NOT to severe. I would even argue that the fact that she is smiling means that by definition the bondage is not to severe. I don't think this is an interpretation of art, I think this is a statement about bondage. In conclusion, I think the artist should make more art like this and that people who dislike this because they find it too excessive needn't look.
Peace
~Guest
Posted by guest (guest) on Tue 06 Oct 2009 09:34:03 PM EDT
Lisa plays the part of a slavegirl, but is not really one
Agree with Guest, but suggest that this enchanted society already thinks the same way. No louts, oafs or thugs. A girly girl wants to display her beauty, love & serve, & be completely safe.
Posted by Apprentice Elf (guest) on Sat 15 Aug 2009 06:46:38 AM EDT
Recent comments
(view all 17 comments)I love the innocence here
Posted by Guest on Wed 24 Feb 2010 04:54:09 PM EST
I (the aforementioned guest) didn't mean to dismiss others fantasies. Some were suggesting that the bondage was too severe and (I thought) asking the artist to make it less severe. I was simply expressing that I appreciate the severity of it and don't...
I (the aforementioned guest) didn't mean to dismiss others fantasies. Some were suggesting that the bondage was too severe and (I thought) asking the artist to make it less severe. I was simply expressing that I appreciate the severity of it and don't want this kind of art to go away. Also, art isn't (IMO) totally open to interpretation. If I interpreted this painting to be of a unicorn, you could disagree. Some things about this are objective, like the fact that the girl is smiling, which should suggest that the bondage is, at least in her opinion, NOT to severe. I would even argue that the fact that she is smiling means that by definition the bondage is not to severe. I don't think this is an interpretation of art, I think this is a statement about bondage. In conclusion, I think the artist should make more art like this and that people who dislike this because they find it too excessive needn't look. Peace ~Guest
Posted by guest (guest) on Tue 06 Oct 2009 09:34:03 PM EDT
Lisa plays the part of a slavegirl, but is not really one
Agree with Guest, but suggest that this enchanted society already thinks the same way. No louts, oafs or thugs. A girly girl wants to display her beauty, love & serve, & be completely safe.
Posted by Apprentice Elf (guest) on Sat 15 Aug 2009 06:46:38 AM EDT